February 2012
Dominican USA Tv →
January 2012
6 tags
6 tags
5 tags
WatchTHE REBIRTH • JULIAN BAH (by INRICLOTH)
Instagram Says It’s Working On Android App |... →
3 tags
B.GOLD →
Check out my Brand… and Follow us on Twitter @BGOLDNYC
Doctor accused of misdiagnosing Detroit-area kids... →
B.Gold →
Like us on Facebook
4 tags
2 tags
A little pleasure in life... (click on the image) →
3 tags
6 tags
4 tags
4 tags
6 tags
Sounds from Monday morning
A letter from Senator Charles Schumer on Protect...
To: Me@gmail.com Show details
Dear Mr. Garcia:
Thank you for contacting me to express your concerns about S. 968, or the PROTECT IP Act of 2011.
Over the last several weeks, I heard from many of my constituents who, like you, had severe concerns about the PROTECT IP legislation being considered in the Senate. I take those concerns very seriously, and I agree with you that we need to find a...
PCIPA: What it is, and why it's worse than SOPA,...
Lamar Smith is a name you should not only know, but dislike. He introduced SOPA. Well, SOPA is now dead, but the war is not over. Now, he's at it again. He has come up with another overzealous bill designed to punish a few by punishing all. The Protecting Children from Internet Pornographers Act sounds like a good thing, which is what makes it so dangerous. Most people who only hear the title will be in favor of it, and the same goes for politicians, and members of Congress. But if you look within the bill, it is a VERY different story. In fact, it has nothing to do with children, or porn. It requires your ISP(AT&T, etc. whoever provides your Internet) to record your credit card numbers, bank account numbers, home address, IP addresses, every website you visit, every transaction you make, everything you download. Anything you do on the Internet is recorded, and stored for 18 months. This in itself is sketchy, but the truth is, they probably already know most of this. But, here's where the bill turns bad. That information can be viewed without a warrant, or probable cause. Here's a scenario where things can turn ugly: A sheriff decides that they're not making enough money from speeding tickets. So, he arbitrarily picks a few people from his town, and simply tells the ISP "I need these people's information." They have to give it to him. No warrant. No probable cause. Just because he said he wanted it. Lo and behold, John Smith watched a copyrighted YouTube video. Now John Smith is being fined $5000. Is it just me, or is Lamar Smith just determined to destroy the Internet? What does r/politics think of PCIPA?
Sources: http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/08/the-legislation-that-could-kill-internet-privacy-for-good/242853/ and here: http://gcn.com/articles/2011/08/05/protecting-children-bill-could-kill-internet.aspx